Thanks for the links Roy. I'll definitely check them out.
Cool, this is one of the first times I've seen TypeMock in action and I can definitely think of some situations where it would be useful when you are dealing with an existing code-base that wasn't built with testability in mind. Especially to enable untestable code to be more safely refactored.
Thanks Roy!
Cool video. I've been intending to review TypeMock for a while and this is a nice jumpstart.
hey thanks for the video
From the example the dependency on Config and Logger is not broken at all, all i saw from the example was how you can use Typemock to side step this tight coupling between the ActionHandler and Logger and ActionHandler and Config, to make your tests pass.
Nice video, Roy. I'm left with two questions:
1. After running each test, some kind of panel pops up that appears to let you navigate tabs using the keyboard only. No mouse. Is this yet another R# feature?
2. I would like to hear more about which of the features you've demonstrated are available in which version of TypeMock. Obviously, I'm looking to see how far the Community Edition will take me.
flipdoubt :
The panel I suspect you're seeing is me pressing Ctrl-Tab. If not, I'm also double clicking on the stack output lines in the output window (the ones that have (line,column) strings like (10,0).
this is a feature of visual studio.
Also, the community edition will only let you write reflective mocks (the ones with strings). Natural mocks are only available in the pro and enterprise edition.
Here's a feature comparison list:
http://www.typemock.com/Features.html
Are you going to include typemock best preactices more in your unit testing. I already have subscribed for the book and in the early releases it looks like you have not mentioned much about typemock best practices.