The tale of the $40 DVD player -- or why I hate the CHEAP! CHEAP! CHEAP! mentality of Americans today

So my brother decided to get one of those cheapo-dvd players for $40. I was given the task of setting this up for my mom, and my first thought was "what an utter piece of junk this thing is. I'll be surprised it it lasts 6 months."

To no surprise, it failed within 2 hours of use. I told my brother to return it and PLEASE let me go with him to pick out a better model -- something that was at least $100 with a brand name, since he insisted on being so cheap! He declined and came back with another $40 player with the hopes that it wouldn't die so quickly. We'll see how long this one lasts...

I looked at the specs -- audio signal to noise ratio of 60dB -- how pathetic -- analog cassettes have a better s/n ratio than that! I truely wonder exactly how cheap the D/A converters are in that thing. I see DVD-Rom drives going for like $16 these days.. the decoder card I can see being $10 -- I don't think they can meet the standard consumer electronics price point of selling at 4 times manufacturing costs. If they indeed do with these no-name chinese players, then how they manufacture them for $10 is beyond me.

I do in fact personally own the player that started this cheap! cheap! cheap! craze -- the Apex AD600A -- which I bought solely for the novelty of playing MP3-CD's in 2000, when it was the only player that could do so. While it still works today, I regret the purchase in a way, because it was just a sign of things to come. I do fully intend to purchase a Sony 999ES or the earlier 9000ES one day in the next two years. Then I'd have a DVD player on par with the rest of my audio equipment, but since I am more of a music person than a video or movie buff. Nor do I have the space or money in college for a really nice TV.

I suppose my point is, why do people WANT to buy this crap, solely on the fact that it's cheap? What happened to people willingly spending money on things that LAST, rather than things that are CHEAP! As I said, standard fare in the consumer electronics world is sell at 4 times manufacturing costs. If they somehow got the costs to $10 in china for that player, it's no wonder that the parts inside do indeed, suck. And the quality control does too. And under what labor conditions was this thing manufactured to meet that price point and still make a profit?

I look at a lot of my stereo equipment, a lot of which is 10-year old Rotel gear that is solid as a brick (and yes, made in china), some 10-year old Sony ES components (Made in Japan), and I have a 20-year old Tape deck (Technics 3 head) which retailed for $400 when it was new. All of it still works, and works beautifully. I bet you it will all still be working in 10 more years. But I spent the time to earn the extra money and spend it on *quality.*

I look at those $500 computers in the same way. Sure it's cheap, but what was the cost to get there? Memory shared with the Video card? CPU with high clockspeed but castrated L2 cache? Hard drive that will fail in one year? I still have some $2000-$3000 machines that are 6 years old and solid as a brick. I have a working Apple II+ still.

C'mon people, demand quality again. And Quality costs MONEY. I had a discussion with a GM engineer a couple months ago who was shocked that Toyota (Lexus) switched steel suppliers on a whim for their RX330 manufacturered in Canada, because the hood panel gap was something like .05" too much, and the Japanese engineer decided it was the steel they were using that was the problem, so they are now shipping steel in from Japan rather than using a local supplier in Canada.

My response to him was, "Well you do that 128 times, and you end up with a better car, not just a better part."

6 Comments

  • sorry about that. I had keywords in for "video" and "DivX" which both tainted my post and the comments.

  • Most el cheapo dvd players are in fact produced by the top brands, and have internal components from those top brands. The top brands have perhaps a more sophisticated end amp or some extra color enhancer, but a dvd player is in fact pretty simple: a 'player' component which simply drives the disc and controls the laser and a chip with software to consume the read bits.



    I wouldn't pay more than 50$ for a DVD player, because every dollar more is for marketing and the brandname, not the quality.

  • Regarding $500 computers, I recently bought two Dell PowerEdge 400 SC servers, each for less than $500 after rebate, and they're some of the best machines I've owned. They're incredibly well put-together, with a well thought-out layout of components, an almost completely toolless chassis (you only need a screwdriver for the drive rails if you add a new drive, PCI cards, AGP, etc., can all be installed with no tools).



    The machines came with P4 HT processors (one is a 2.4ghz and one is a 2.8), an 80GB 7200 RPM HD, and base RAM of 128 MB. I've added better video cards, more RAM, and DVD burners to each machine, but even as shipped, they were quite good, and not even remotely could they be called junk.



    The point being that going cheap sometimes gets you junk, but sometimes, it can get you a bargain. It's all in how much research you do, and what you're willing to spend.

  • Ajay,



    Truth of the matter is a lot of people don't care much about audio/visual quality. What use is a good dac listening through tv speakers or a cheap htib. A lot of people I know that bought dvd players is for the sole reason of not having to rewind those vhs tapes. Also with technology changing so fast people have trouble justifying expensive purchases. If something breaks in a year, you can usually buy a better one for cheaper.

  • I agree completely that you get what you pay for. It's really quite simple. Of course, our knee-jerk reaction to anything on sale, or cheap, is "oooohhh... what a deal!"



    I don't think "deals" exist. Sure - 400 dollars seems like a rather large sum to pay for a turntable, but I have heard many times of people who are still using their Technics 1200s 20+ years after they bought them, and they still work flawlessly. That is unbelievable to me.

  • Its consumers didn’t aspire to be cosmopolitan or courageous.
    In part, this is because the carbohydrates in the flour receive an ample amount of hydration during the kneading and leavening process.

Comments have been disabled for this content.