Omar AL Zabir blog on ASP.NET Ajax and .NET 3.5

You have a hot ASP.NET+SQL Server product, growing at thousand users per day and you have hit the limit of your own garage hosting capability. Now that you have enough VC money in your pocket, you are planning to go out and host on some real hosting facility, maybe a colocation or managed hosting. So, you are thinking, how to design a physical architecture that will ensure performance, scalability, security and availability of your product? How can you achieve four-nine (99.99%) availability? How do you securely let your development team connect to production servers? How do you choose the right hardware for web and database server? Should you use Storage Area Network (SAN) or just local disks on RAID? How do you securely connect your office computers to production environment?

Linq to Sql does not come with a function like .Delete(ID) which allows you to delete an entity using it’s primary key. You have to first get the object that you want to delete and then call .DeleteOnSubmit(obj) to queue it for delete. Then you have to call DataContext.SubmitChanges() to play the delete queries on database. So, how to delete object without getting them from database and avoid database roundtrip?

If you are using Linq to SQL, instead of writing regular Linq Queries, you should be using Compiled Queries. if you are building an ASP.NET web application that’s going to get thousands of hits per hour, the execution overhead of Linq queries is going to consume too much CPU and make your site slow. There’s a runtime cost associated with each and every Linq Query you write. The queries are parsed and converted to a nice SQL Statement on *every* hit. It’s not done at compile time because there’s no way to figure out what you might be sending as the parameters in the queries during runtime. So, if you have common Linq to Sql statements like the following one throughout your growing web application, you are soon going to have scalability nightmares:

Everyone agrees that unit testing is a good thing, we should all write unit tests. We read articles and blogs to keep us up-to-date on what’s going on in the unit test world so that we can sound cool talking to peers at lunch. But when we really sit down and try to write unit tests ourselves – “Naaah, this is waste of time, let’s ask my QA to test it; that’s much more reliable and guaranteed way to test this. What’s the point testing these functions when there are so many other functions that we should unit test first?” Had such moment yourself or with someone else? Read on.

One of my friends, who runs his own offshore development shop, was having nightmare situation with one of his customers. He's way overdue on a release, the customer is screaming everyday, he's paying his team from his own pocket, customer is sending an ever increasing list of changes and so on. Here's how we discussed some ideas to get out of such a situation and make sure it does not repeat in future:

If you are planning to start SCRUM at your company, you might need to train developers and QA to get into the mindset of an Agile developer. SCRUM is only successful when the developers and QA get into the habit of following the principles of SCRUM by heart. So, sometimes you need to offer training or do trial sprints to give some room to your developers how to get used to the working fashion of SCRUM. Giving them a handy workflow diagram that shows how they should work helps soothe the steep learning curve required for non-super star developers. I made such a workflow while I was teaching SCRUM at my friend's company. The following diagram was printed and hung over the desk of each and every developer to help them grasp the culture of SCRUM quickly:

You can setup continuous integration and automated deployment for your web application using CruiseControl.NET, Subversion, MSBuild and Robocopy. I will show you how you can automatically build the entire solution, email build report to developers and QA, deploy latest code in IIS all using CruiseControl.NET every N minutes.

I have two broadband connections. One cheap connection, which I mostly use for browsing and downloading. Another very expensive connection that I use for voice chat, remote desktop connection etc. Now, using these two connections at the same time required two computers before. But I figured out a way to use both connections at the same time using the same computer. Here's how: