Attention: We are retiring the ASP.NET Community Blogs.
Learn more >
What's the fuss about VS .NET 2003?
Robert and Darren are probably going to hit me, but I really don't understand what's the fuss about old (he he) and current versions of .NET Framework and Visual Studio .NET, I mean, I've been using both versions of the product for months now with hardly a glitch. 1.0 apps work only with 1.0 (VS .NET included). 1.1 apps could work with 1.0 but why? If you have a 1.1 app just install the 1.1 Framework and go for it. I have had both versions side by side and used 1.0 and 1.1 apps right here in this laptop without any major loose of time (let alone data or code). May be I am just so silly that I don't get it...
3 Comments
<smack>
I'm glad you get it man :). Most people don't. A guy tried to install VS.NET 2003, then uninstalled 1.0 and wondered why VS.NET 2002 stopped working. Felt the need to help explain the situation to Everett virgins.
You are right: I forgot about the guys that don't read the READMEs, I'm not being sarcastic here, I know there is no lack of them and I actually get some money (and guru status) from the fact.
"Everett virgins" :))), now this is a good one, I will surely use it in my presentations.
come cazzo faccio a ripristinare il framework 1.0 ?